Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
DQ828  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, October 24, 2012 9:28:32 PM(UTC)
DQ828

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/17/2010(UTC)
Posts: 368
Location: australia

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
I would like to incorporate a balance Control in my BIII Setup, I have read a bit about DIY balance controls on the Elliot sound website but need a bit of advice on; what ohm pot should be used at the output of the Ivy3 to achieve the balance control & not upset the impedance between the Ivy & my Linkwitz Active analog crossover.

I was probably going to try the setup shown in Figure 5 http://sound.westhost.com/project01.htm but leaving out he volume pot.
Brian Donegan  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, October 24, 2012 9:52:26 PM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
It would be better to do it in the digital domain. Let me think on it....
thanks 1 user thanked Brian Donegan for this useful post.
DQ828 on 10/24/2012(UTC)
DQ828  
#3 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 1:12:22 AM(UTC)
DQ828

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/17/2010(UTC)
Posts: 368
Location: australia

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Brian Donegan Go to Quoted Post
It would be better to do it in the digital domain. Let me think on it....


Just for clarification, even though I am using Arduino to control my system I have not removed your firmware chip so I am doing everything externally.

My thoughts where to take a similar approach to the one I have used for the volume, whereby I would install a motorized 4 channel pot, use 2 channels for the balance & 1 channel for the Arduino to read the location of the balance control, then display it on the screen somehow. The pot would be controlled via the remote.

If there is a digital way to do a similar thing I am all ears, or should that be eye's.

DQ828  
#4 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 9:01:49 AM(UTC)
DQ828

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/17/2010(UTC)
Posts: 368
Location: australia

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Brian

How are the digital thoughts coming along?

If you think it's a no go, I would appreciate some advice on what Ohm pot you think I should use, I have read the Linkwitz ASP has a 10K Ohm input impedance.
DQ828  
#5 Posted : Friday, December 28, 2012 10:40:18 AM(UTC)
DQ828

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/17/2010(UTC)
Posts: 368
Location: australia

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Brian

Any thoughts
Russ White  
#6 Posted : Friday, December 28, 2012 1:53:38 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Balance control is easily achieved using an external controller.

I have it implemented for the AC2 and I am sure it would be simple to add it to an arduino type controller as well.
Corpius  
#7 Posted : Friday, December 28, 2012 3:38:13 PM(UTC)
Corpius

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/1/2012(UTC)
Posts: 332
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 18 post(s)
Do you have a dual mono setup? If so, that you can use the arduino to set the volume of each DAC independently from each other. This would require you to remove the firmware.

Another solution is to use a two channel digital potentiometer controlled by your Arduino, but I don't know how much this would degrade the signal integrity.
Russ White  
#8 Posted : Saturday, December 29, 2012 5:03:50 AM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
You don't need a two channel pot. :)

You don't even really need any pot at all depending on your UI.

No degradation need occur at all because everything is done at the digital level in the DAC.

Edited by user Saturday, December 29, 2012 5:05:30 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Corpius  
#9 Posted : Saturday, December 29, 2012 8:49:58 AM(UTC)
Corpius

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/1/2012(UTC)
Posts: 332
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 18 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Russ White Go to Quoted Post
You don't need a two channel pot. :)

You don't even really need any pot at all depending on your UI.

No degradation need occur at all because everything is done at the digital level in the DAC.
Interesting! Can this be achieved with the master trim you mentioned a few years ago at diyaudio?

http://www.diyaudio.com/...8-a-126.html#post1707811

.

Edited by user Saturday, December 29, 2012 8:51:46 AM(UTC)  | Reason: typo

Russ White  
#10 Posted : Saturday, December 29, 2012 4:10:02 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
You only need use the volume registers. Every channel has one. :)
Corpius  
#11 Posted : Saturday, December 29, 2012 4:26:31 PM(UTC)
Corpius

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/1/2012(UTC)
Posts: 332
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 18 post(s)
How stupid of me Whistle . The answer is often much simpler as one expects. Thanks!
DQ828  
#12 Posted : Thursday, January 3, 2013 12:17:10 PM(UTC)
DQ828

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/17/2010(UTC)
Posts: 368
Location: australia

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Sorry guy's I fell asleep at the wheel, I didn't realise anyone had posted.

When I'm not exhausted I'll see if I can understand what your getting at.

No I don't have dual mono.

Corpius  
#13 Posted : Thursday, January 3, 2013 2:49:25 PM(UTC)
Corpius

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/1/2012(UTC)
Posts: 332
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 18 post(s)
You have to remove the firmware chip and use a external controller (Arduino or other) to achieve balance control. A slightly modified version of HiFiDUINO will work very well.
DQ828  
#14 Posted : Friday, January 4, 2013 10:19:25 AM(UTC)
DQ828

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/17/2010(UTC)
Posts: 368
Location: australia

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Corpius Go to Quoted Post
You have to remove the firmware chip and use a external controller (Arduino or other) to achieve balance control. A slightly modified version of HiFiDUINO will work very well.


That simple, well I'll be, when I finally get my speakers finished I'll get back to it, Iv'e been without music for 4 days & it's starting to hurt.

Thanks gentlemen.

DQ828  
#15 Posted : Friday, January 4, 2013 10:29:26 AM(UTC)
DQ828

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/17/2010(UTC)
Posts: 368
Location: australia

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
I had a quick look, please correct me if I am wrong, below is the VOID setup for adjusting the volume.

void setSabreVolume(byte regVal)
{
writeSabreReg(0, regVal); // set up volume in DAC1
writeSabreReg(1, regVal); // set up volume in DAC2
writeSabreReg(2, regVal); // set up volume in DAC3
writeSabreReg(3, regVal); // set up volume in DAC4
writeSabreReg(4, regVal); // set up volume in DAC5
writeSabreReg(5, regVal); // set up volume in DAC6
writeSabreReg(6, regVal); // set up volume in DAC7
writeSabreReg(7, regVal); // set up volume in DAC8
}

I assume what I would do to get the balance is add something like this;

void setSabreBalance(byte regVal)
{
writeSabreReg(0, regVal); // set up volume in DAC1
writeSabreReg(1, regVal); // set up volume in DAC2
writeSabreReg(2, regVal); // set up volume in DAC3
writeSabreReg(3, regVal); // set up volume in DAC4
}

PS: I haven't checked the actual DAC channels, but my theory would be that I only needed to make one side (say left channel in stereo mode) adjustable to achieve a balance control.
Corpius  
#16 Posted : Friday, January 4, 2013 10:52:46 AM(UTC)
Corpius

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/1/2012(UTC)
Posts: 332
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 18 post(s)
That's the way to go, but do check the actual DAC channels for left and right.
DQ828  
#17 Posted : Friday, January 4, 2013 12:03:22 PM(UTC)
DQ828

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/17/2010(UTC)
Posts: 368
Location: australia

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Thanks Corpius.

I have been forgetful though, when I originally posted this question it was for my, & I guess still is for my, first Arduino BIII build, which will not have the firmware removed :)

This solution will work beautifully for the new BIII SE Arduino build, but that doesn't solve the original question. I'm thinking I may have to abandon the balance control idea for DQ BIII No1 :)
Corpius  
#18 Posted : Friday, January 4, 2013 12:57:42 PM(UTC)
Corpius

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/1/2012(UTC)
Posts: 332
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 18 post(s)
HI DQ828,

It won't be possible when not removing the firmware, unless you use a circuit like the one on the ESP pages. When using digital pots for this you'll still be able to use the Arduino to set the balance :)
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser (16)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.