Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Floric  
#1 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 3:49:02 PM(UTC)
Floric

Rank: Member

Groups: Customer
Joined: 11/5/2006(UTC)
Posts: 24
Location: southern Bavaria

Hello,

now a different (second) setup: MUX -> ASRC -> 2xOpus

Because the complete chain did lead to distortion and noise at the first trial, I tried to get the MUX -> Opus working. It works! Stereo and dual mono! But: If I set the OSR-Pin of the Opus "low" - according to the datasheet this means maxiumum oversampling (4x) in the DAC. If I feed the combo with 44.1 kHz spdif, nothing happens, absolute silence. If I set OSR to "medium" or "high", I hear music without any errors or noise.

If I understand the datasheet of the cs8416 correctly, it should be the other way round. As far as I see, the cs8416 does not any sample rate conversion. So 44.1kHz in, 44.1 kHz out. But Opus tells me a different story.

If I don't get the correct sampling rates, there is no chance of configurimg the ASRC correctly, as far as I see.

So does the cs8416 do any upsampling?
Did I get anything wrong?

Thanks in advance

Flo
Russ White  
#2 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 3:59:13 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
NO the CS8416 is not up sampling.
Floric  
#3 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 4:12:20 PM(UTC)
Floric

Rank: Member

Groups: Customer
Joined: 11/5/2006(UTC)
Posts: 24
Location: southern Bavaria

Wow, that was quick! Thank you Russ.

Just tested it again, no sound from the Opus with OSR "low" - "medium and "high" work.

Strange thing because my cpd puts out 44.1 for shure.

Think

Regards

Flo

glt  
#4 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 6:42:06 PM(UTC)
glt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/9/2007(UTC)
Posts: 453
Location: usa

Are you using 128 fs or 256 fs?
Switch 2: RMCK Frequency – Changes the output recovered master clock frequency.
“-” - RMCK Frequency = 256*Fs (typically used for 32-48kHz)
“+” - RMCK Frequency = 128*Fs (typically used for > 48kHz)

With 128fs, you will loose the low setting because it falls outside of the "supported" fs. Look at this entry:

http://hifiduino.blogspo...ction-to-wm8741-dac.html

and

http://hifiduino.blogspo...m/2009/12/blog-post.html (click on image)

Edited by user Monday, January 31, 2011 6:44:25 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Floric  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, February 1, 2011 6:01:03 AM(UTC)
Floric

Rank: Member

Groups: Customer
Joined: 11/5/2006(UTC)
Posts: 24
Location: southern Bavaria

glt wrote:
Are you using 128 fs or 256 fs?
Switch 2: RMCK Frequency – Changes the output recovered master clock frequency.
“-” - RMCK Frequency = 256*Fs (typically used for 32-48kHz)
“+” - RMCK Frequency = 128*Fs (typically used for > 48kHz)

With 128fs, you will loose the low setting because it falls outside of the "supported" fs. Look at this entry:

http://hifiduino.blogspo...ction-to-wm8741-dac.html

and

http://hifiduino.blogspo...m/2009/12/blog-post.html (click on image)


Thank you glt,

this way I know that I am still cxapable of reading datasheets, at least :d/

I think that's the problem, I set it to 128*fs like recommended in the manual without thinking about it, was only thinking about the sampling frequency. Will check it when I'm back at home.

I think that this could be related to the problem I had with the asrc.

Regards

Flo
Floric  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, February 1, 2011 3:57:00 PM(UTC)
Floric

Rank: Member

Groups: Customer
Joined: 11/5/2006(UTC)
Posts: 24
Location: southern Bavaria

Hi glt,

that has been my error - always the mistake, that 128*fs is higher than 256*fs... how could I remember when I need it?

By tha way, got the metronome working too. Almost the same... too stupid!

Best regards

Flo
glt  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, February 1, 2011 5:36:34 PM(UTC)
glt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/9/2007(UTC)
Posts: 453
Location: usa

I'm glad you sorted it out.
Even though I'm using the BII, I'm still a fan of OPUS/WM8741 :-)
Floric  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, February 2, 2011 12:36:54 AM(UTC)
Floric

Rank: Member

Groups: Customer
Joined: 11/5/2006(UTC)
Posts: 24
Location: southern Bavaria

And from a first impression it sounds even better with the asrc, at least to my ears.
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser (6)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.