Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
jota  
#1 Posted : Monday, September 13, 2010 7:57:43 AM(UTC)
jota

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: italy


mysterious failure...........
my BuffaloII DAC works fine with a Pioneer player pd-d9mk2. But if I connect to a PC+M2tech hiface digital audio interface, not work. But with an identical one in BuffaloII, a friend of mine works. How is this possible?
regards
Brian Donegan  
#2 Posted : Monday, September 13, 2010 8:17:23 AM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
Can you try swapping M2Techs and see if it is still a problem?
jota  
#3 Posted : Monday, September 20, 2010 6:52:46 AM(UTC)
jota

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: italy

My little PC is working ok, my m2tech works well with another DAC (gigawork), but does not work with my Buffalo Dac II! but it works with my CD player ...... What can I do?
regards
Brian Donegan  
#4 Posted : Monday, September 20, 2010 1:58:39 PM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
Can you try swapping M2Techs and see if it is still a problem?
jota  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, September 21, 2010 3:57:40 AM(UTC)
jota

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: italy

ok Brian
I'll do another test with m2tech my friend ....
Regards
jota  
#6 Posted : Sunday, September 26, 2010 10:08:43 AM(UTC)
jota

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: italy

hi Brian,
did the test with m2tech my friend. Not working. What can I do? seems to work well with my Buffalo 16bit/44Khz signal, but 24/192 is not working ....
Regards
LeonvB  
#7 Posted : Sunday, September 26, 2010 10:47:16 AM(UTC)
LeonvB

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/23/2010(UTC)
Posts: 708
Location: Netherlands

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 48 time(s) in 45 post(s)
IMO That points to low signal integrity. What is the exact setup? If you are using a mux, try running SPDIF or better/shorter wires to the Buffalo.
jota  
#8 Posted : Monday, October 4, 2010 3:59:20 AM(UTC)
jota

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: italy

Exact setup? Mini Pc Acer Aspire One+ Buffalo II whit three power supply+ tube preamp 1578 SRPP (or D3a inductive load tube preamp)+ power amp Nelson Pass F4. Tested all the cables I have at home. Van de hul tried cable 10 cm. It does not work ....( sigh!)
somewhere else?
best regards
Carlo
LeonvB  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, October 5, 2010 10:27:42 AM(UTC)
LeonvB

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/23/2010(UTC)
Posts: 708
Location: Netherlands

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 48 time(s) in 45 post(s)
Sorry, but by exact I really mean exact. Your text describes a global layout, but it doesn't say how it's exactly put together. A Buffalo II isn't a standard box you buy, you mix and match parts as you see fit. Also, mentioning a brand like van den hul is totally useless unless you say how you used it and what cable: for internal use there are 23 different cables that are all branded van den hul, and that's just the current line-up. Please be more specific and if possible add pictures of the lay-out.
jota  
#10 Posted : Friday, October 15, 2010 10:08:31 AM(UTC)
jota

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: italy

My set is Buffalo32 whit dual mono power supply LCBPS and digital power supply LCDPS whit 30W R-Core transformers. Cable 20-25cm teflon silver plated military grade.
this is image:
http://img715.imageshack...715/7686/immagine310.jpg
http://img375.imageshack...75/3249/immagine306o.jpg
any input?
best regards
Carlo
MartinC700  
#11 Posted : Saturday, October 16, 2010 6:59:15 AM(UTC)
MartinC700

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 9/7/2010(UTC)
Posts: 43
Location: San Diego

Thanks: 1 times
When first building my Buff II, I hooked up via a Hiface and couldn't get a lock at 192 either, it was intermittent. I am now using a Hiface EVO and all is fine. I think that the regular Hiface may be the issue. You could try an attenuator on Hiface as apparently it puts out a higher than normal output, this may also reduce signal reflections which some have claimed as a benefit.

Regards
Steamerzone  
#12 Posted : Saturday, October 16, 2010 9:50:04 AM(UTC)
Steamerzone

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 1/2/2010(UTC)
Posts: 19
Location: Borne

I also couldn't get a lock on 192khz with my buff II, that was when using a Esi Julia card, which has has a pretty stable output normally.

To fix it I mounted a S/PDIF Transceiver Module in between....not a elegant solution but in my case a simple one, I had the tranciever lying around anyway. (and using the I2S inputs of the ES9018 instead)


It is know by several designers/manufactures that the S/PDIF reciever of the ES9018 at 192khz is a bit iffy! Some reduce the spec of the dac back to 176,4 and some include some kind of S/PDIF reciever chip before the ESS chip.

Emile

Edited by user Saturday, October 16, 2010 9:55:22 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

MartinC700  
#13 Posted : Saturday, October 16, 2010 7:45:36 PM(UTC)
MartinC700

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 9/7/2010(UTC)
Posts: 43
Location: San Diego

Thanks: 1 times
Steamerzone wrote:
I also couldn't get a lock on 192khz with my buff II, that was when using a Esi Julia card, which has has a pretty stable output normally.

To fix it I mounted a S/PDIF Transceiver Module in between....not a elegant solution but in my case a simple one, I had the tranciever lying around anyway. (and using the I2S inputs of the ES9018 instead)


It is know by several designers/manufactures that the S/PDIF reciever of the ES9018 at 192khz is a bit iffy! Some reduce the spec of the dac back to 176,4 and some include some kind of S/PDIF reciever chip before the ESS chip.

Emile


Hi Emile,

I had the same thought, but now having the Hiface EVO as a low jitter source, though that adding the S/PDIF reciever might actually be a step backwards. When my Buffalo is fully assembled I'll report back the results.

Regards

stephen1212b  
#14 Posted : Monday, October 18, 2010 8:36:43 PM(UTC)
stephen1212b

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 7/10/2010(UTC)
Posts: 25
Location: san rafael ca

HiFace works here at 192 driven by Pure music from an older intel MacMini. I have read that not all of the usb outputs are the same in terms of speed, so try all of the various usb outputs on your computer. It also helps if you can keep the bus that communicates with the dac as free of other uses as possible. My music is stored on an external firewire when I use the USB HiFace. Before I used a Firewire interface so then I connected the music drive via USB.
jota  
#15 Posted : Monday, November 1, 2010 9:23:10 AM(UTC)
jota

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: italy

using "The S/PDIF Transceiver Module"
between Pc+hiFace and Buffalo Dac could solve my misterious failure?

Any comments?
thanks
LeonvB  
#16 Posted : Monday, November 1, 2010 11:54:43 AM(UTC)
LeonvB

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/23/2010(UTC)
Posts: 708
Location: Netherlands

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 48 time(s) in 45 post(s)
An SPDIF receiver could solve the issue, but I would suggest waiting for the new USB module. It'll provide I2S output, and plays at least 24 bit/192 Khz (but Russ aims for 32/384).
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.