Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
MrMajestic  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, March 3, 2009 4:29:44 PM(UTC)
MrMajestic

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/21/2007(UTC)
Posts: 150
Location: Sweden

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Are there any plans on making some kind of display interface for the Buffalo DACs? Would be great to be able to see what format, bit-rate and sample frequency is being used for example.
sp502  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, March 3, 2009 5:11:05 PM(UTC)
sp502

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/24/2008(UTC)
Posts: 11

I am also investigating the possibility of using a display with buffalo.
I am using a microcontroller to communicate through I2C with the DAC
but it seems that there is no obvious register to keep this kind of info.
The chip used in MUX board could provide the info but I think the board
lacks the I2C output.

Russ White  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, March 3, 2009 8:22:40 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Good news, the Buffalo32 has a status register which can be read and from which the current input sample frequency can be calculated.

Now doing something with that will require some firmware. :)

The I2C interface works in both directions, it can be read from and written to. :)

Cheers!
Russ

Edited by user Tuesday, March 3, 2009 8:23:31 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

MrMajestic  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, March 3, 2009 10:43:02 PM(UTC)
MrMajestic

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/21/2007(UTC)
Posts: 150
Location: Sweden

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
That´s cool Russ. Now if only someone would write such a piece of firmware ;)
glt  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, March 4, 2009 1:03:42 PM(UTC)
glt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/9/2007(UTC)
Posts: 453
Location: usa

Would it be appropriate to start a collaborative project based on a common open platform such as arduino or equivalent? I know this would be in direct competition with that TPA plans on doing, but the amount of open source libraries, development platforms and low cost hardware will allow this project to move fairly fast.
Brian Donegan  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, March 4, 2009 1:39:15 PM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
We plan on using the AC1/Femto platform for just such an application. The Femto is easily flashed via it's USB(A) jack, so anyone who wished can write custom firmware.
glt  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:41:08 PM(UTC)
glt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/9/2007(UTC)
Posts: 453
Location: usa

Hi Brian, I am aware of AC1 and related. I think the equivalent of ACI/Femto and associated peripherals can be purchased for very little money: http://www.nkcelectronic...-arduino-compatible.html , a serial LCD: http://web4robot.com/SerialLCD.html , and there is a lot of open source software available. There is software for IR remote handling: http://www.arduino.cc/cg...YaBB.pl?num=1210243556/0 , http://www.rtfa.net/2008...ra-red-ir-remote-control , software for rotary encoders: http://www.arduino.cc/pl...ound/Main/RotaryEncoders , etc. With an "open platform" the audio community can leverage the hardware and software advances of the robotics community.

Edited by user Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:48:34 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser (3)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.