Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
dariedel2  
#1 Posted : Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:52:32 PM(UTC)
dariedel2

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 1/15/2013(UTC)
Posts: 49
United States
Location: DC

Thanks: 1 times
Hello Russ or Brian,

I have MiniDSP USBStreamer which I plan to use as 8 channel interface to either 4 OPUS or 1 Buffalo III. I already have the OPUSs but am thinking my project might be easier/better with a Buffalo III.

USBStreamer works as Master Clock. OPUS works as slave, but I read Buffalo works as its own master clock.

Will the USBStreamer work with the Buffalo III for my purposes? Am I crazy for considering the Buffalo over the OPUSs, or am I on the right track?

Reading Forum and other DIY sites has me confused with regard to the master/slave situations!

thanks,
Doug
Brian Donegan  
#2 Posted : Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:21:37 PM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
It should work fine with the Buffalo. You just leave out MLCK (Pin 9).

The Buffalo has an on-board ASRC, so does not require/use the master clock.
dariedel2  
#3 Posted : Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:29:11 PM(UTC)
dariedel2

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 1/15/2013(UTC)
Posts: 49
United States
Location: DC

Thanks: 1 times
Thanks for the confirmation, Brian.

Finally, I already purchased three OPUS and would need a fourth for 8 channels. I've heard varying stories of success/failure in simply splitting clock wires to multiple OPUSs which is why I am now considering the Buffalo III.

Am I overconcerned about the multi Opus clock wiring, or do you agree the Buffalo will be a better choice?

Thanks,
Doug
Brian Donegan  
#4 Posted : Thursday, September 11, 2014 6:14:38 PM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
Well, four is a lot. With that many, you may need to start worrying about the current required to to drive all the gates. It really depends on how much current the outputs of the USB Streamer can support. (This only pertains to LRCK and SCK lines).

I would give it a shot with the Opus boards, since you already have them. It will probably work fine. the inputs are fairly high impedance (not sure of the exact value off the top of my head).

If there is a problem, you can simply use some logic chips to act as a buffer and you won;t have any problems, but it does add some complexity.
dariedel2  
#5 Posted : Thursday, September 11, 2014 6:29:05 PM(UTC)
dariedel2

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 1/15/2013(UTC)
Posts: 49
United States
Location: DC

Thanks: 1 times
OK thanks.

I would like to read up on the use of logic chips (just in case). can you point me in right direction as to how this might be set up or where to read about it?

BTW: You guys really are great at providing advice and go way above what would be expected for a DIY product!! Thanks
Amaro  
#6 Posted : Thursday, September 18, 2014 7:59:23 PM(UTC)
Amaro

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/19/2009(UTC)
Posts: 61
Location: Spain

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 6 post(s)
Hi dariedel.

You can use two SI8660 like buffer and isolator chip. Is very easy to use. They can be mounted on DIP/SOIC adapters boards.

Regards

Semaphore  
#7 Posted : Friday, March 6, 2015 7:10:15 PM(UTC)
Semaphore

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/23/2014(UTC)
Posts: 7
United States
Location: Colorado

Just a follow up on this. I think I found a solution to my need which is to use miniDSPs USB streamer as input into the Buffalo III. This would bypass the AES16e altogether. I could get rid of my AES16e and my Lucid 88192 and replace it with a Buffalo III and UsbStreamer (in theory). Total price would be about the same for my purposes and would be a much better solution. I could even use it with my laptop instead of needing a bulky desktop.
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser (5)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.