Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
pcking  
#1 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:04:58 AM(UTC)
pcking

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 9/24/2008(UTC)
Posts: 14
Location: Singapore

Is it possible to connect the I2S output (as shown below) directly from a Philips CDPro2LF transport to the Buffalo ?


UserPostedImage

Edited by user Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:10:21 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Brian Donegan  
#2 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 5:29:39 AM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
Yes and no. The connections are correct, but the CDPro only outputs 48fs data, and the Buffalo requires 64fs. You can either use a Metronome (or other upsampler) to achieve this, or simply use the CDPro's S/PDIF outputs, which is what I would recommend for simplicity.
pcking  
#3 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:05:10 AM(UTC)
pcking

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 9/24/2008(UTC)
Posts: 14
Location: Singapore

Hi Brian,

thanks for your quick reply. If simplicity & cost aside, which do U think will have a better sound quality ?

1) (CD Pro2LF via I2S) >>> Metronome >>> Buffalo

or

2) (CD Pro2LF via SPDIF) >>> Buffalo
Brian Donegan  
#4 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:32:48 AM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
According to Dustin at ESS, there should be no difference in sound quality, despite what other are saying on various forums. I cannot hear a difference, and I choose to trust the chip designer (call me crazy).
pcking  
#5 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 12:04:37 AM(UTC)
pcking

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 9/24/2008(UTC)
Posts: 14
Location: Singapore

So when will the Buffalo be available for order ?
Can't wait to try it out with my DIY CD Player. Anxious
Brian Donegan  
#6 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 5:01:08 AM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
We are in the process of getting more ready now.
wobbly  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:40:01 PM(UTC)
wobbly

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/13/2008(UTC)
Posts: 22
Location: Tauranga - New Zealand

I have all but completed my CDPRO2 - Metronome - Buffalo combo, cant wait to test the spdif/I2S back to back.
So I need the switch settings for 64fs on the Metronome.

Texas replied "You don't need any settings for system clock frequency selection, it is automatically detected by internal clock manager circuit. Either of 128/192/256/384/512/768fs detection is based on LRCK clock as fundamental sampling rate, fs. If the output port is being operated in Master mode, the BCK is fixed at a 64Fs rate, where Fs = the output sampling rate."

So - what is your recomended switch setup to achieve this.

thanks

wayne

Edited by user Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:41:21 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

pcking  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, October 15, 2008 8:20:52 PM(UTC)
pcking

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 9/24/2008(UTC)
Posts: 14
Location: Singapore

Hi Wayne,

I am about to do exactly what U did so it would be nice if you could post your views/results once U have tested the SPDIF vs the I2S. (using Metronome)

Looking forward to your review. Anxious

wobbly wrote:
I have all but completed my CDPRO2 - Metronome - Buffalo combo, cant wait to test the spdif/I2S back to back.
So I need the switch settings for 64fs on the Metronome.

Texas replied "You don't need any settings for system clock frequency selection, it is automatically detected by internal clock manager circuit. Either of 128/192/256/384/512/768fs detection is based on LRCK clock as fundamental sampling rate, fs. If the output port is being operated in Master mode, the BCK is fixed at a 64Fs rate, where Fs = the output sampling rate."

So - what is your recommended switch setup to achieve this.

thanks

wayne

Russ White  
#9 Posted : Thursday, October 16, 2008 7:27:27 AM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
wobbly wrote:
I have all but completed my CDPRO2 - Metronome - Buffalo combo, cant wait to test the spdif/I2S back to back.
So I need the switch settings for 64fs on the Metronome.

Texas replied "You don't need any settings for system clock frequency selection, it is automatically detected by internal clock manager circuit. Either of 128/192/256/384/512/768fs detection is based on LRCK clock as fundamental sampling rate, fs. If the output port is being operated in Master mode, the BCK is fixed at a 64Fs rate, where Fs = the output sampling rate."

So - what is your recomended switch setup to achieve this.

thanks

wayne



For I2S output on the metronome the bit clock is already fixed at 64fs. So you don't need to do anything for that.

Just set the Metronome input 24-bit I2S and to output 24-bit I2S at 512fs, 256fs, or 128fs (48khz,96khz,192khz respectively) per the manual and wire bit clock, word clock, and data to the Buffalo. Wire your bit clock, word clock, and data from the CDPRO2 to the metronome.

That should be all you need to do.

Cheers!
Russ

Edited by user Thursday, October 16, 2008 7:28:46 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

wobbly  
#10 Posted : Thursday, October 16, 2008 2:29:20 PM(UTC)
wobbly

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/13/2008(UTC)
Posts: 22
Location: Tauranga - New Zealand

Thanks alot for advise.
Technically or aurally any advantages/disadvantages to be had say increasing the sampling from 96 to 192

Edited by user Thursday, October 16, 2008 2:31:39 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Russ White  
#11 Posted : Thursday, October 16, 2008 3:48:39 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Well, I don't really know. Try both and see what you like. :)

What I do know is that once the I2S is received the DAC will upsample it to about 2mhz. :)

Cheers!
Russ
wobbly  
#12 Posted : Monday, October 27, 2008 6:29:31 PM(UTC)
wobbly

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/13/2008(UTC)
Posts: 22
Location: Tauranga - New Zealand

Have tried the back to back,I2S against SPDIF.
First test was the CDPRO2 with Tent reclocked Spdif,very difficult on HD650s but on my full system the only difference i could detect was the sound of the "room" in the recordings. I2S seems to convey more minutae of sound decays and the illusion of space in the venue or studio.
Swapping to a Pioneer PD506 ( an oldie but goody with upsidedown transport) this Spdif had no detail at all in comparison, as did a Shanling CDT200.
So - appears the old story about source quality dictating the end result still applies, the top notch transport with clean Spdif is very very good, but even the clever Sabre cannot reconstruct good sound from a substandard digital stream.
Played around with the Metronome sampling and cant hear any difference at all between 96 or 192

Edited by user Monday, October 27, 2008 6:31:33 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Chris_hu  
#13 Posted : Sunday, November 9, 2008 5:17:11 AM(UTC)
Chris_hu

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/8/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1
Location: Hungary

Brian Donegan wrote:
Yes and no. The connections are correct, but the CDPro only outputs 48fs data, and the Buffalo requires 64fs. You can either use a Metronome (or other upsampler) to achieve this, or simply use the CDPro's S/PDIF outputs, which is what I would recommend for simplicity.


Brian:

from the Sabre8 specifications:
"The SPDIF switch should be “OFF” for PCM input. The default basic firmware is setup for 24bit I2S
PCM format."

As I know, the "24bit I2S" means "48fs data" (64fs = 32bit)

am I right?


My original plan was using my buffalo with my CDPro2LF i2s signal directly...Brick wall
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser
Similar Topics
Wire type for i2s connection (S/PDIF 4:1 MUX/Receiver)
by branko 4/9/2012 8:26:34 AM(UTC)
I2S connection issues (Opus DAC)
by DJAGAB 6/3/2011 11:31:46 AM(UTC)
Stable I2S connection on BII only after a warm-up ? (Buffalo DAC)
by Indigo 3/1/2011 11:47:02 PM(UTC)
OPUS DAC + USB DAC: I2S connection: no sound (USB Receiver/DAC)
by kgodfather 7/14/2009 11:00:17 AM(UTC)
Wiring I2S Connection (Buffalo DAC)
by stewart 12/23/2008 10:26:34 PM(UTC)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.