Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


6 Pages<1234>»
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
christensenleif@msn.com  
#21 Posted : Tuesday, April 17, 2012 10:48:46 AM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

hello
somebody mentioned transistor error on sidecar
I have BC 639 on at least on of them
is it supposed to be BC550?
can this cause the trouble?
best
Leif
Russ White  
#22 Posted : Tuesday, April 17, 2012 11:02:19 AM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
BC639 is correct.
christensenleif@msn.com  
#23 Posted : Tuesday, April 17, 2012 11:55:57 AM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

removed transformers and installed jumpers on s/pdif pcb
still weird:
both s/pdif 1 and 2 play rock solid when other input is unconnected from rack isolated rca connector to pcb input
once wire from unused rca minus is connected to unused imput minus, active s/pdif looses lock
not same with positive lead to positiv input
neither input will play with muinus signal connected to gnd instead of minus input header. i.e shorted
if I hook up both inputs and put a jumper between the minus signals on the rca connectors, and move source cable from Denon dvd to input 1 to 2 the lock is stable on either input whether selector is on 1 or 2
not so wth wav sd card player player
any way I can measure if a source is consumer lvl or ttl lvl?

any checkpoints I can Ohm to look for differences on input 1 and 2?

best
Leif
Brian Donegan  
#24 Posted : Tuesday, April 17, 2012 12:24:44 PM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
Try tying - to GND on the input headers (directly).
christensenleif@msn.com  
#25 Posted : Tuesday, April 17, 2012 2:35:09 PM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

still without transformers:
tying minus to gnd on input headers on s/pdif board mutes the signal
when playing with good lock and disconnected minus lead on other input, mutes anyway actually
are the R5-16 correct values at 4K7?
when I measure across R13/14/15 and 16 I get 4K7, the rest 2K9
just touching the minus header on the unused input with a screwdriver creates immedeate dropouts and instability on the other input in use
what puzzles me is that both dac´s are the same, even slightly differently configured
this grounding scheme has always been good enough with BII or any other application
at least I2S is rock solid now
best
Leif

Edited by user Tuesday, April 17, 2012 2:51:52 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Jordo  
#26 Posted : Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:00:48 PM(UTC)
Jordo

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2011(UTC)
Posts: 474
Location: Amsterdam

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Hi Leif,

I think Henri has got the solution in his hand. I try to get me some drawings so we can use it too!

Jordo
christensenleif@msn.com  
#27 Posted : Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:12:58 AM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

hello
will try tonight, but first I have to fix my mailbox that was seriously spammed yesterday, despite I never open anything!
now Microsoft closed it, so I have to re-initiate it through some sort of MS initiated process
best
Leif
Jordo  
#28 Posted : Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:39:11 AM(UTC)
Jordo

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2011(UTC)
Posts: 474
Location: Amsterdam

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Ok, sorry to hear! We builders can use all the time available..

I made a little drawing which I made from the pictures Henri showed me.
I hope it's correct like this. Maybe Russ or Brian can approve this. I will ask them.

Success!

Jordo
Jordo attached the following image(s):
spanningsdeler.png (12kb) downloaded 170 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Jordo  
#29 Posted : Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:12:12 AM(UTC)
Jordo

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2011(UTC)
Posts: 474
Location: Amsterdam

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Ok forget the last picture, this is how it should be done:

Jordo attached the following image(s):
spanningsdeler 2.jpg (18kb) downloaded 169 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
christensenleif@msn.com  
#30 Posted : Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:21:13 PM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

I replaced the 10K on input 3&4 with 75R and there´s no change
still unstability with open unused input or connected unpowered
best
Leif
Russ White  
#31 Posted : Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:24:55 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Jordo wrote:
Ok forget the last picture, this is how it should be done:



As long as by + and - you mean the TTL output of the TORX board. :)
Jordo  
#32 Posted : Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:05:16 PM(UTC)
Jordo

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2011(UTC)
Posts: 474
Location: Amsterdam

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Like this or reversed?

(I just worked out the picture before I read your post)
Jordo attached the following image(s):
spanningsdeler 3.jpg (27kb) downloaded 145 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Russ White  
#33 Posted : Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:15:38 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Jordo wrote:
Like this or reversed?

(I just worked out the picture before I read your post)


Reversed.
Jordo  
#34 Posted : Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:23:05 PM(UTC)
Jordo

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2011(UTC)
Posts: 474
Location: Amsterdam

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Hahaha! I was already busy correcting it.
Henri fooled me. He is drawing from right to left Angel

Edited by user Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:30:04 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Jordo attached the following image(s):
spanningsdeler 5.jpg (27kb) downloaded 130 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
christensenleif@msn.com  
#35 Posted : Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:59:50 PM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

can´t even make it work properly with:
75R on all inputs
w/o x-formers on s/pdif 1&2
both pluss and minus tied to gnd on unused/and unwired 3&4
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
separate switch for vdc to sidecar "b" taken from BIII I2C header

best
Leif
christensenleif@msn.com  
#36 Posted : Friday, April 20, 2012 4:29:12 AM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

could you guys possible send me 2 FW chips to test
I´ll pay of course
can´t think of anything else.....
pleazee?
best
Leif
Russ White  
#37 Posted : Friday, April 20, 2012 9:12:11 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Jordo wrote:
Hahaha! I was already busy correcting it.
Henri fooled me. He is drawing from right to left Angel


That is still not right , the 75 would come at the opposite end of the 270R.
Jordo  
#38 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2012 4:24:47 AM(UTC)
Jordo

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2011(UTC)
Posts: 474
Location: Amsterdam

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Russ White wrote:
Jordo wrote:
Hahaha! I was already busy correcting it.
Henri fooled me. He is drawing from right to left Angel


That is still not right , the 75 would come at the opposite end of the 270R.


Damn, I will adapt it this evening.

But some other solution maybe;
Someone on the Dutch DIY Audio Forum came up with the idea to connect the Toslink module directly to the DAC bord so the S/Pdif module and Sidecar will be bypassed. This will prevent some TTL conversions.
And the COAX cables can be connected to the S/Pdif board the conventional way..

The only downside will be that the Toslink to DAC signalcables will be a bit longer..

I will try it this evening.
Sounds like a good idea?

Jordo
henri47  
#39 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2012 5:28:00 AM(UTC)
henri47

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/26/2010(UTC)
Posts: 83
Location: Flanders (Belgium)

Hi Jordo,
I'm thinking of redesigning the backplate of the dac in a way that all the inputs lye directly behind the 4*SPDIF board. I'll try to design a double layer print that houses 2 SPDIF modules and 2 coax inputs and place for the Voltage dividers. The board should be mounted on the connector of the 4*SPDIF board and he inputs will be shielded with Tin compartments connected to GND.
In that way you will not have a need of coax or whatever kind of wire to connect to the 4*SPDIF board and influence on one eachother will be minimised. I want to do this because I think the SPDIF inputs are very sensitive for all kind of factors: Long wires, interferences, etc.
Btw.: I appologise for the confusing information I gave about the Voltage divider. I attach a few pictures of how it should be . I think I switched the values of the resistors in one of the pictures i've sent.
Kind regards,
Henri
henri47 attached the following image(s):
fig05.gif (4kb) downloaded 69 time(s).
spanningsdeler.png (9kb) downloaded 71 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Russ White  
#40 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2012 6:06:25 AM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Yes that is correct. It is very easy to neatly accomplish this without any board. Just take the two resistors and solder one end of each together along with the hot wire of the pair or coax. Then put the free end of the 270 in the OUT terminal, and the free end of the 75R in the GND terminal along with the cold wire or the pair or coax(soldering them together is a good idea). Run this to the SPDIF4 or Sidecar if you are using it. Very simple.

To be clear the SPDIF4 module is a comparator circuit. It is designed to turn a small signal into a large one. The TORX board is already a large signal and it can easily swamp the comparator input as well as distort smaller signals via EMI. It also likely causes some nasty reflections. It is *MUCH* better to convert a TTL signal to consumer level prior to the SPDIF4.

In my experience, and long as you keep the ribbons short and the pairs from the consumer inputs twisted or shielded you need not fret very much. Still it is definitely best to keep the routing as neat and short as practical.

Cheers!
Russ

Edited by user Saturday, April 21, 2012 6:07:41 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser (12)
6 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.