Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


7 Pages<12345>»
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
avr300  
#41 Posted : Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:56:00 PM(UTC)
avr300

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/17/2008(UTC)
Posts: 921
Denmark

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 69 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Russ White Go to Quoted Post
The other thing to try (though this will require a bit more work) - would be to add R-C filter from Ref 2 to the non-inverting input of the opamp. This will wuire the cutting of one trace, and soldering to the pin of the opamp.

I would try say 1K 47-220uf.

keep in mind - this will slow the startup time.


There's no need to. REF2 is clean.
avr300  
#42 Posted : Sunday, March 23, 2014 9:01:35 PM(UTC)
avr300

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/17/2008(UTC)
Posts: 921
Denmark

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 69 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Russ White Go to Quoted Post
First thing i would try is just a larger C3 - try 1nf


Its better but it not good.

With 2n2 it has improved, going to 4n4 is fractional better than 2n2.
Russ White  
#43 Posted : Sunday, March 23, 2014 9:40:19 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Sorry I meant C5, the comp cap.

I figured ref2 was clean - thanks for confirming.

One other change would be insert a series resistance from the output of the opamp to the base of QP4. The should make the compensation more effective - and better isolate the error amp from the capacitive load. You would need to cut a trace to do that - I would start with 221 and go up to say 2K.

Russ White  
#44 Posted : Sunday, March 23, 2014 9:42:28 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Similarly a small series resistor from the output to the opamp decoupling cap (c3) would likely help too. Maybe 21-47R

Edited by user Sunday, March 23, 2014 10:47:00 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Russ White  
#45 Posted : Sunday, March 23, 2014 9:46:12 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
avr300 check your email. :)
avr300  
#46 Posted : Sunday, March 23, 2014 9:48:01 PM(UTC)
avr300

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/17/2008(UTC)
Posts: 921
Denmark

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 69 post(s)
Test will be carried out tomorrow (GMT+2, CET).
musicman  
#47 Posted : Tuesday, March 25, 2014 5:57:43 PM(UTC)
musicman

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 3/8/2011(UTC)
Posts: 136
Location: Norway

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Have been playing for some days now and must say I am very impressed with the sound from theese beta Placid's, oscillation or not. A huge step forward in musicality. Every aspects of the sound is better compared to the earlier version(s).

Must say it's going to be interesting to hear what 'avr' have to say in his search for a 100% clean psu.

Ps; I have replaced almost all of the stock electrolyttics with Elna Cerafine ( on BP) and Elna SilmicII ( on HD ). Love this caps and most likely they are on off many changes that in summary ends up as the best sounding psu in my B-IIIse.
musicman  
#48 Posted : Thursday, March 27, 2014 9:47:48 PM(UTC)
musicman

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 3/8/2011(UTC)
Posts: 136
Location: Norway

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Avr, where are you ?
avr300  
#49 Posted : Thursday, March 27, 2014 10:05:29 PM(UTC)
avr300

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/17/2008(UTC)
Posts: 921
Denmark

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 69 post(s)
Right here.

;-)
musicman  
#50 Posted : Friday, March 28, 2014 5:23:25 AM(UTC)
musicman

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 3/8/2011(UTC)
Posts: 136
Location: Norway

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Ok , nice,,,and the test you promised us ?

avr300  
#51 Posted : Friday, March 28, 2014 3:23:22 PM(UTC)
avr300

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/17/2008(UTC)
Posts: 921
Denmark

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 69 post(s)
Promised and promised.

Hang on - information is to posted.
LeonvB  
#52 Posted : Friday, March 28, 2014 6:10:17 PM(UTC)
LeonvB

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/23/2010(UTC)
Posts: 708
Location: Netherlands

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 48 time(s) in 45 post(s)
Today the Beta kits arrived (finally). A job at the customs office over here must be extremely relaxing: if we don't process it this week, there's always next week or the week after that.
avr300  
#53 Posted : Friday, March 28, 2014 6:12:51 PM(UTC)
avr300

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/17/2008(UTC)
Posts: 921
Denmark

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 69 post(s)
Don't populate before further info is received.
Brian Donegan  
#54 Posted : Friday, March 28, 2014 6:20:21 PM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
I will be putting together some mod kits to adapt the initial beta kits for the mods that have been worked out (details of which are to follow).

Sorry Leon... More waiting, unless you have a few extra parts handy...
LeonvB  
#55 Posted : Friday, March 28, 2014 6:42:23 PM(UTC)
LeonvB

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/23/2010(UTC)
Posts: 708
Location: Netherlands

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 48 time(s) in 45 post(s)
Since I'm using pretty tough lead-free stuff, it's very fortunate I didn't run to the soldering iron right after posting. :)
Russ White  
#56 Posted : Friday, March 28, 2014 10:33:36 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Ok Guys, prepare for a long post.

AVR300 and I have been working hard testing and modding the beta kits to get the ultra low noise we were expecting.

What we found initially is that the error amp needed better isolation from the output to prevent some unwanted feed-forward, then we noticed that the error amp did not particularly like being directly connected to the VREF, and that the VREF itself needed some love.

This involved a few days of back and forth and measuring. :)

In the end we found that supply was very stable, but needed tweaking to really get the low noise we want.

So here it is - it requires some PCB surgery, and it is definitely easier to do these prior to stuffing the boards. You can do it after, but it will require some desoldering and careful work.

I will post pictures to aid in modding (forgive the state of the boards, they have been through a lot).

Here are the details:

film caps used are 220nf

Rs at vref are 470R (221R to 680R should be ok)

vref filter caps are 47uf(at least 16V) I used 25V.

Rs at Vout are 47R (22.1R to 75R should be ok)

Steps, cut traces from outputs to C3 close to the output.

Install 47R from C3 to output.

Remove VREF2 - snip pin 1;

Cut trace from VREF2 to VREF_TP

Install VREF2 as per the picture.

Install 47uf cap in place of VREF2 observing correct polarity as per picture.

Install 470R resistor as per picture.

Install 220nf across VREFs as per the picture.

Repeat for other half of the placid in case of placid BP.

The production boards will incorporate these changes.

Thanks so much to AVR300 who worked some late nights with me on this. You rock man!

I have also attached the last scope shot of the output - perfectly clean. :)

Edited by user Friday, March 28, 2014 10:42:47 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Russ White attached the following image(s):
20140328_111717.jpg (216kb) downloaded 87 time(s).
20140328_111744.jpg (212kb) downloaded 141 time(s).
20140328_125809.jpg (187kb) downloaded 134 time(s).
20140328_125901.jpg (147kb) downloaded 112 time(s).
image004.png (111kb) downloaded 120 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
avr300  
#57 Posted : Friday, March 28, 2014 10:35:23 PM(UTC)
avr300

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/17/2008(UTC)
Posts: 921
Denmark

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 69 post(s)
Originally Posted by: avr300 Go to Quoted Post
Test will be carried out tomorrow (GMT+2, CET).


Test was a little longer than expected ;-)

First I must say, I was wrong. The Placid was not oscillating. It only looked that way. Sorry for that.

I'm sure Russ has more info for you Beta folks. Hang in, it will be posted soon.

edit: look above ;-)

Edited by user Friday, March 28, 2014 10:37:47 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked avr300 for this useful post.
Russ White on 3/28/2014(UTC)
avr300  
#58 Posted : Friday, March 28, 2014 11:52:07 PM(UTC)
avr300

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/17/2008(UTC)
Posts: 921
Denmark

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 69 post(s)
Perhaps I should mention that it actually do works.

Man - it works.

In another threat I have been writhing that the Placid 1.0 (Q) modified was way better than the 1.0 original. It was / is.

But - this one is better than the 1.0 Q


Russ description is straight forward - as long as you already have done it ;-)

Feel free to claim even more pictures describing how to implement "beta-to-production".
musicman  
#59 Posted : Saturday, March 29, 2014 9:38:02 AM(UTC)
musicman

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 3/8/2011(UTC)
Posts: 136
Location: Norway

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: avr300 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: avr300 Go to Quoted Post
Test will be carried out tomorrow (GMT+2, CET).


Test was a little longer than expected ;-)

First I must say, I was wrong. The Placid was not oscillating. It only looked that way. Sorry for that.

I'm sure Russ has more info for you Beta folks. Hang in, it will be posted soon.

edit: look above ;-)




Thx for info, but now you made me confused. You say that the beta Placid is not oscillating, it only looked that way ?

I'am asking becouse the beta version ( not modded yet ) are playing very well. Better than the older one.

If the beta version not oscillate, what is the reason to start modding it ? Does the sound improve even more after this latest mod, or does it measure even better ?

Thx
avr300  
#60 Posted : Saturday, March 29, 2014 12:32:38 PM(UTC)
avr300

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/17/2008(UTC)
Posts: 921
Denmark

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 69 post(s)
It wasn't oscillation - it was noise. To me unacceptable noise.

Noise that was coming from the voltage reference and the error amplifier - or the combination of the two.

Both cured by the modification.


If your Placid isn't suffering from noise - then the modification perhaps isn't necessary for you to make. It is completely up to you.

You could try to scope the output to see for yourself.

Remember it's a beta run. Changes are expected.
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser (33)
7 Pages<12345>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.