Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Crom  
#1 Posted : Monday, March 25, 2013 11:41:39 AM(UTC)
Crom

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 1/22/2013(UTC)
Posts: 34
United Kingdom

Thanks: 1 times
Hi Russ and Brian,

I am building an SRPP tube output stage to your wonderful DAC and getting good results. I am looking for some assistance with refinement to the design:

In my design I have used 2 tube-i-zator circuits and created a balanced design (currently using one BIIIse but with the ultimate aim of using 2 x BIIIse for full dual mono). The default I/V resistor value specified is 56R (you can see the circuit here: http://www.diyaudio.com/...ge-tube-i-zator-v2.0.pdf )

I believe in the past that you have recommended to experiment with 20R-30R but is this still the case for a balanced, dual mono design?

I am also interested to know what I should be listening for as I change the values. I currently am using 4 x 22R within the DAC but I can't really tell the difference between this and the originals. Are my ears just terrible or do I just not know what to listen for ;-) I also have a scope but I am not sure what to measure so I am currently doing it by listening!

I know that this is probably stretching your 'support goodwill' a little but there have been 2 further refinements to the output circuit and I'd be interested in whether similar changes can be made if the circuit is being used for a BIII (as opposed to the TDA 1541A). The modifications are shown here:

https://imageshack.us/a/.../8856/tubeizatormod2.jpg
https://imageshack.us/a/...eizatorccsfortda1541.jpg

Thank you for any thoughts.
Crom
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.