Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Active Users


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
NicMac  
#1 Posted : Friday, April 1, 2011 2:47:27 PM(UTC)
NicMac

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 299
Location: Italy

I'm having repeated problems with voltage settings on some LCBPS modules (i.e. the voltage is not adjustable). I have a strong feeling that it is the pots that are unreliable so I decided to use fixed resistors in stead of fixed+pot and using the standard LM317 calculation: V=1.25x(1+R1/R2).
With R1 = 4K7 and R2 = 330R I get 12.6V !? (should be 19.05V).
What am I missing?
avr300  
#2 Posted : Saturday, April 2, 2011 12:30:39 AM(UTC)
avr300

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/17/2008(UTC)
Posts: 921
Denmark

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 69 post(s)
Du you measure the voltage out under load ?

If so, what's the load ?
NicMac  
#3 Posted : Saturday, April 2, 2011 3:13:07 AM(UTC)
NicMac

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 299
Location: Italy

Without load so it is not an "over-load" related issue.

EDIT: Problem solved. I had popped in 3W 2.7KR resistors (and not 2.7R) in the CRC circuit. Wonder where I got those fromd'oh!

Edited by user Saturday, April 2, 2011 4:41:00 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

needsp  
#4 Posted : Saturday, April 2, 2011 3:43:13 AM(UTC)
needsp

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 7/22/2009(UTC)
Posts: 81
United Kingdom
Location: Norwich, UK

Thanks: 2 times
Hi Nic

Is the input voltage high enough to give 19V out? You need- if I remember correctly- at least 5V across a 317 reg for it to work properly

Paul
NicMac  
#5 Posted : Saturday, April 2, 2011 4:49:42 AM(UTC)
NicMac

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 299
Location: Italy

Hi Paul,
Nice to hear from you! I solved the problem (stupid mistake on my side - see edit above).
I'm using the LCBPS's as pre-regs for the S17/37LN-15 regs for the Legato (3 sets). Did you understand if we will still be able to do this with Legato 3.1 (i.e. is the current demand < 120 mA per rail @ 15V for all 6 rails on the Legato)?
Cheers,
Nic
needsp  
#6 Posted : Saturday, April 2, 2011 5:42:29 AM(UTC)
needsp

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 7/22/2009(UTC)
Posts: 81
United Kingdom
Location: Norwich, UK

Thanks: 2 times
Hi Nic

Glad you sorted it out! Done the same sort of thing myself... :-)

Only Russ could tell you that for certain. But I think the current drawn by the L and R I/V sections will stay the same (certainly TP0604's in place of BS250KL's won't affect this; BTW did you try these FETs yet- bloody marvelous!). The current needed by the Bal to SE stage will increase, because of Russ' mod to allow better drive to headphones. But you may still be OK, as this circuit only draws 15mA in the earlier versions of Legato, giving you about 100mA extra to play with.

I fitted my S17/37LNs directly to modified LCBPS boards in place of the 317/337's, and adjusted the series resitors to put about 4.5 V across the regs. Living more dangerously, dissipation-wise, than you, but avoided getting higher V transformers

Hope this helps

Paul
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser (4)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.