Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
needsp  
#1 Posted : Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:09:27 PM(UTC)
needsp

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 7/22/2009(UTC)
Posts: 81
United Kingdom
Location: Norwich, UK

Thanks: 2 times
Hi Russ and Brian

How much current will each rail of each of the three sections of IVY III draw? (with a 15/0/-15V supply)

Thanks

Paul

NicMac  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:01:25 PM(UTC)
NicMac

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 299
Location: Italy

Bump - same question!
Nic
karvid  
#3 Posted : Friday, April 23, 2010 10:31:26 AM(UTC)
karvid

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/7/2010(UTC)
Posts: 18
Location: Sweden

needsp wrote:
Hi Russ and Brian

How much current will each rail of each of the three sections of IVY III draw? (with a 15/0/-15V supply)

Thanks

Paul



You will find the answer here:
http://www.twistedpearau....aspx?g=posts&t=1034

Edited by user Friday, April 23, 2010 10:32:08 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

NicMac  
#4 Posted : Friday, April 23, 2010 1:10:29 PM(UTC)
NicMac

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 299
Location: Italy

Thanks for the link and prompt reply :-)
glt  
#5 Posted : Friday, April 23, 2010 1:56:38 PM(UTC)
glt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/9/2007(UTC)
Posts: 453
Location: usa

(hijacking the tread) Nic, how is that IVYIII-ucd project going?
NicMac  
#6 Posted : Saturday, April 24, 2010 3:50:39 AM(UTC)
NicMac

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 299
Location: Italy

Hi glt,
I have been doing a bit of testing with my B32 and the UCD's. I have compared the un-modded ST and the op-amp by-passed version with my UCD HG HxR "reference".
The B32 is perfectly capable of driving the by-passed UCD and the sound quality is superb! It is way better than the un-modded ST and I think also better than my reference even if I will have do some listening. Having only two gain stages and no caps between the DAC and speakers is just about as simple as it can get and I think it is the winning way. Till now I have been using the B32 set for 2VRMS output and the total gain will be a tad low for some speakers and listening levels. With the IVYIII I will try 4VRMS and maybe even higher (8VRMS with BII in dual-mono configuration) if somebody can assure me that this is sane. I cannot hear any difference with or without the 22R output impedance set on the Buffalo.
I recently started to use regulated supplies for the UCD's and this also brought quite a bit of improvement.
When I have finished (re)casing the DAC and UCDs and I will post some pics.
Cheers,
Nic
glt  
#7 Posted : Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:39:30 AM(UTC)
glt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/9/2007(UTC)
Posts: 453
Location: usa

Hi Nic, thanks for sharing your findings. That would be my plan. Since I currently have the udc180hg (no hxr), I think I'll upgrade to the UCD400st and use IVY III straight to the UCD modulator. That would make a "zero input impedance Amp" :-). I'm waiting for audiopower.it to release their regulated smps that will work with the ucd400 (it even has an unregulated +/- 22V that can be used to power Placid). As you said, this is probably the ultimate simplest path to the speakers.

Edited by user Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:44:27 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Dmitry Nevozhay  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, July 6, 2010 3:03:59 AM(UTC)
Dmitry Nevozhay

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 6/27/2010(UTC)
Posts: 11
Location: Moscow, Russia

NicMac wrote:
Hi glt,
It is way better than the un-modded ST and I think also better than my reference even if I will have do some listening. Having only two gain stages and no caps between the DAC and speakers is just about as simple as it can get and I think it is the winning way. Till now I have been using the B32 set for 2VRMS output and the total gain will be a tad low for some speakers and listening levels. With the IVYIII I will try 4VRMS and maybe even higher (8VRMS with BII in dual-mono configuration) if somebody can assure me that this is sane. I cannot hear any difference with or without the 22R output impedance set on the Buffalo.
I recently started to use regulated supplies for the UCD's and this also brought quite a bit of improvement.
When I have finished (re)casing the DAC and UCDs and I will post some pics.
Cheers,
Nic


Hi Nic!
Where can i read about bypassing UcD400ST? Does it make sense to bypass UcD400HG?
Can you inform us about your further listening comparision and experiment with 4/8VRMS outputs?

Wich power supplies have your tried for feeding UcD400?
(audiopower.it's DPS-400 vs. Hypex SMPS400A400 vs. Hypex UcD Supply ST vs. UcD Supply HG vs. something else).
What's the best sounding one for Buffalo->IVY->UcD400 combination???
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.