Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Lazybutt  
#1 Posted : Saturday, December 11, 2010 9:44:07 PM(UTC)
Lazybutt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/20/2010(UTC)
Posts: 17
Location: Shanghai China

Hello,
This is possibly a stupid question, so forgive me if I didn't get something right (Brick wall ), but from the manual, we set VR1 and VR2 so that there is 250mV accross R1 and R2, so there is 250mA flowing through all components: R1, R2, VR1, and VR2.

VR1 and VR2 are set at around 50 ohms... doing the calculation, that means they dissipate 50*0.25*0.25 = 3.125W !!!! (and that's on only 25% of the pot surface !!!)
But these components are rated at 0.5W... what am I not getting right..?? shouldn't these pots be higher rated ??

Edited by user Monday, December 13, 2010 11:16:23 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Lazybutt  
#2 Posted : Monday, December 13, 2010 11:15:26 PM(UTC)
Lazybutt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/20/2010(UTC)
Posts: 17
Location: Shanghai China

Hello again,
Incidentally, the parts list says these pots should be 20 Ohms, but the Manual and schematics state 200 Ohms.

In addition, I'd be interested to understand why these pots were moved from modulating the current at the base of QP1, QN3 in V2.1.1 to the emitter in V2.1.2 ?
Similarly, is there any reason for abandonning the constant current source provided by Q2 and Q6 in V2.1.2? Do LEDs provide better regulation by themselves ?
Thanks a lot!

Edited by user Monday, December 13, 2010 11:17:05 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Russ White  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, December 14, 2010 4:41:43 AM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
You are not doing the calculations right. :)
Lazybutt  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, December 14, 2010 6:02:13 AM(UTC)
Lazybutt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/20/2010(UTC)
Posts: 17
Location: Shanghai China

Russ White wrote:
You are not doing the calculations right. :)


Hahaha, I'm probably not doing the reasonning right, but the calculations..... Brick wall

P=R.I^2 (That one I'm taking for granted right ???)
R= 50 Ohms (that one from tha manual: "adjust the CCS pots so that the resistance across the CCS R positions (VR1 and VR2) is about 50ohm"))
I= 0.25 A (again, the manual "until the measured voltage across R1 and R2 are ~ 0.25V" R1=1 so I=0.25, and what flows through R1 flows through VR1)

Now I understand where my reasonning is wrong... I'm assuming VR1 stays at around 50 ohm.. but once adjusted, VR1/2 are probably nvery far from 50ohm, but more at around 1-2 ohm...

Am I correct ?

Edited by user Tuesday, December 14, 2010 6:02:50 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Brian Donegan  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, December 14, 2010 6:15:56 AM(UTC)
Brian Donegan

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,868
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 134 post(s)
I=V/R and P=IV
P=V^2/R
P=.25^2/50
P=.00125W
Lazybutt  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, December 14, 2010 6:31:05 AM(UTC)
Lazybutt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/20/2010(UTC)
Posts: 17
Location: Shanghai China

Brian Donegan wrote:
I=V/R and P=IV
P=V^2/R
P=.25^2/50
P=.00125W


Sorry, but aren't you mixing apples and carrots there ??? (i.e the voltage accross R1 with the resistance of VR1...)

if the voltage across R1 is 0.25V (as we aim as per the manual), then it just cannot be the same across VR1 (which is in series with R1) if VR1=50ohm ....

.... Or I didnt understand the voltage divider theory... Whistle

Edited by user Tuesday, December 14, 2010 6:35:29 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Russ White  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, December 14, 2010 7:20:57 AM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
The solution is really really simple. :)

While the placid is running measure the voltage drop across the pot (only the pot - it is in rheostat mode).

Then measure the pot resistance with the placid off. Now you can work out the actual power dissipated.

Edited by user Tuesday, December 14, 2010 7:26:00 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Russ White  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, December 14, 2010 7:23:58 AM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Also we include a 20R and 200R pot for the CCS, but the 20R should always be used unless you are providing very low current of say less than 100ma.
Russ White  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, December 14, 2010 7:27:39 AM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Another point, one you have worked out how much current you need, you can easily replace the pot with a fixed resistor if you like, but there is no need to do so.
Lazybutt  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, December 14, 2010 7:58:42 AM(UTC)
Lazybutt

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/20/2010(UTC)
Posts: 17
Location: Shanghai China

Got it !
Of course would have done that but I don't have my Placid (yet!) and was into thinking that VR1 should be at 50 ohm to deliver 250mA.. Now I understand thats not the case ! Thx !
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser (11)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.