No Idea, how commercial resellers implemented the DAC.
But I tested the optical input today, using TORX173.
Because the casing of the optical receiver is too deep, (and i can not drill squares)
I had to cut the TORX173casing open and glued the optical receiver module behind a cinch socked.
I did proper shielding and decoupling according to the TORX173 datasheet.
Also the receiver runs from a different power source.
Right now, the optical connection is very poor.
I still have to modify a cinch jack with an optical cable to get a good connection.
In the moment, the blank fibre sticks in the cinch socket.
I hear a crackling like in good old record days, but the electrical koax digital inputs are perfect.
So I guess the 9018 input does not mute much earlier than other DACS, because I am still able to hear errors.
The problem must be power related.
The only other gear that gets "triggered" by a light switch is my Sony ZA-5ES DAT.
Edit:
I finished the SPDIF inputs now (6 in total using relais, one of the inputs optical), using a PE65612 1:1 transfomer after the relais board.
Interesting, decoupling the inputs with 10nF capacitors or terminating them (like being proposed in many applications onformations) makes the signal look worse.
So I guess, all decoupling and terminating is done on the Buffalo 2 board? No buffer needed?
Any information on that
I endened up with the PE65612 only in the signal path and a resistor from signal to ground in the torx173, to reduce output from TTL-Level to SPDIF-Level.
The optical signal looks as clean as the coax inputs now.
Playing around with resistor values on the TRX173 showed, that the buffalo would accept SPDIF voltages much below 0.5V.
Also interesting:
The Buffalo 2 will mute an error on a CD on the optical input, but play flawlessy from coax???
Both signals are identical, same source!
Assuming, the optical signal is still degraded (I cannot see any differences on my scope), I do not understand this.
Does this mean, that in some players SPDIf is taken before error correction and interpolation?
But anyway:
The lightswitch problem still exists...
Edited by user Monday, October 4, 2010 12:09:50 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified